The case went to trial Dec. 4 and lasted two weeks.
According to the charge of the court, jurors were asked what sum of money would compensate Randle, which ended up being $3,996,331.02 in damages.
Randle alleges that on Aug. 4, 2012, he was ridding in a vehicle being driven by his brother. The vehicle was stopped at a stop sign when Choates rear-ended the vehicle.
Jurors awarded Randle $3,676,331.02 for his past and future medical expenses, $60,000 for his physical pain, $25,000 for his impairment and $10,000 for his future loss of household services.
Jurors also awarded Randle’s wife, Ruby, $225,000 for her past and future loss of consortium.
In his suit, Randle blames Choates for causing the collision, saying she negligently failed to control her speed, failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to timely apply her brakes, failed to drive in a safe manner and failed to control her vehicle.
Before the trial, Randle had filed a motion to exclude the testimony of one of the defense’s experts, Dr. Joseph Cormier, who was hired to testify on the biomechanics of the collision.
According to the motion, filed Nov. 21, Cormier found force of the collision did not result in Randle’s traumatic neck injury.