Twitter You Tube Facebook Autobodynews Linked In

Friday, 30 March 2018 16:59

Retro News: Problems With Non-OEM Radiators Led to CAPA Certification Program

Written by
In 2013, Jack Gillis of the Certified Automotive Parts Association (CAPA) said his organization found problems with non-certified non-OEM radiators. In 2013, Jack Gillis of the Certified Automotive Parts Association (CAPA) said his organization found problems with non-certified non-OEM radiators.

Index

20 Years Ago in the Collision Repair Industry (May 1998)

The Collision Industry Conference (CIC) task force considering alternatives to the current method of calculating shop compensation for paint materials has drawn up a list of proposed guidelines for any new paint materials calculations system.

 

The task force, which includes collision repairs, insurers, auto and paint manufacturers and estimating system providers, has called for a system that:

 

• is based on surface area of the part being refinished, as provided by the manufacturer of that part;
• includes no caps;
• uses a multiplier for repaired (versus new) panels;
• includes as “refinish materials” only those items listed as such in the Mitchell guide;
• includes all refinish surfaces or areas with no deduction for overlap of adjacent panels;
• includes a blend allowance that averages 50 percent of materials calculated for full painting of a panel; and
• offers different allowances based on the use of different VOC-content products.

 

Representatives of CIC and the task force said some members of the industry have voiced concerns about changing the current system. But Phil Cunningham of Motor Information Systems pointed out that the changes are inevitable. His company’s customers, he said, have asked Motor to create a refinish materials estimate system, just as Mitchell International has.


Previous Page Next Page »

Read 724 times